Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9442 13
Original file (NR9442 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1601
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

  

Ps
TD
ee

 

DIC
Docket No. NR9442-13

10 Jun 14

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

9 June 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material

submitted in support thereof, your maval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered

the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dtd 11 Apr 14, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
che Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panei will be

furnished upon request. .

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board

reconsider its decision upon submission of new and Material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is

on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,
TRS

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Enclosure: NPC memo dtd ii Apr 14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9114 13

    Original file (NR9114 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dtd 9 Apr 14, a copy of which ig attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0449 14

    Original file (NR0449 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser a13/101 dated 3 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0541 14

    Original file (NR0541 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo dated 11 April 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1819 13

    Original file (NR1819 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8620 14

    Original file (NR8620 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8685 14

    Original file (NR8685 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1750-13

    Original file (NR1750-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on ¢ September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1349-13

    Original file (NR1349-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/111 dated 19 April 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02985-09

    Original file (02985-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for y by the Board for Correction of Naval Records {BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04750-07

    Original file (04750-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    04750-07 9 June 2008Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is...